🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". A law may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good starting point," commented one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to harmful social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly happening at the state government level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, additional states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this global conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and its followers indicate that states around the world are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.